DEFENSIBLE HUMAN LIFE IN THE CONNECTING VILLAGES OF NAGARAHOLE FOREST: A CASE STUDY OF METIKUPPE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59415/mjacs.319Keywords:
Human-wildlife conflict; defensible human life; forest fringe settlements; elephant depredation; Nagarahole; socio-ecological vulnerability; livelihood insecurity; participatory governance; community resilience; KarnatakaAbstract
Human settlements situated along protected forest boundaries experience complex socio‑ecological interactions. This expanded study examines defensible human life in the Metikuppe village cluster located near the Nagarahole landscape in Karnataka, India. Using qualitative field observation, secondary datasets, and spatial interpretation, the research analyses patterns of human–wildlife interaction, infrastructural vulnerability, and livelihood insecurity. The findings highlight recurring elephant‑driven crop depredation, transportation isolation, and uneven governance response. The paper argues that defensible human life in forest‑fringe regions requires integrated conflict-mitigation systems, participatory governance, and landscape‑scale planning that balance conservation and human safety
Downloads
References
Ashokkumar, M., Chinnaiyan, S., Kaliyaperumal, S., Shanmugavelu, S., & Desai, A. A. (2021). Determinants of Human-Elephant Conflict in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Southern India. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-640008/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-640008/v1
Dickman, A. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x
Dundi, D. B., Praet, I., & Marvin, G. (2023). Good, quarrelsome, bad: animal agency and human-elephant interactions in the Western Ghats, India. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1142333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1142333
Galley, W., & Anthony, B. P. (2024). Beyond Crop-Raiding: Unravelling the Broader Impacts of Human-Wildlife Conflict on Rural Communities. Environmental Management, 74(3), 590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02018-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02018-9
Gupta, A. (2013). Elephants, safety nets and agrarian culture: understanding human-wildlife conflict and rural livelihoods around Chobe National Park, Botswana. Journal of Political Ecology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/v20i1.21766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v20i1.21766
Karanth, K. K., & Vanamamalai, A. (2020). Wild Seve: A Novel Conservation Intervention to Monitor and Address Human-Wildlife Conflict. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00198
Kei, L. H., Bakri, N. A. A. B., Lin, P., Khairunizan, H. K. B., Yuan, K., & Abdullah, N. H. (2024). Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict: a Comprehensive Review of Strategies for Sustainable Coexistence in Support of SDG 15 [Review of Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict: a Comprehensive Review of Strategies for Sustainable Coexistence in Support of SDG 15]. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe02756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe02756
Köpke, S., Withanachchi, S. S., Perera, E. N. C., Withanachchi, C. R., Gamage, D. U., Nissanka, T. S., Warapitiya, C. C., Nissanka, B. M., Ranasinghe, N. N., Senarathna, C. D., Dissanayake, H. R., Pathiranage, R., Schleyer, C., & Thiel, A. (2024). Factors driving human–elephant conflict: statistical assessment of vulnerability and implications for wildlife conflict management in Sri Lanka. Biodiversity and Conservation, 33(11), 3075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02903-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02903-z
Margulies, J. D., & Karanth, K. K. (2018). The production of human-wildlife conflict: A political animal geography of encounter. Geoforum, 95, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.011
MoEFCC. (2018). Human–Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Guidelines.
Prasad, S. V., Aditya, V., Solomon, J., & Karanth, K. K. (2025). Community mitigation decisions in elephant conflict zones of southern India depend on environmental and socio-economic drivers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 34693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14867-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14867-3
Rohini, C. K., Aravindan, T., Das, K. S. A., & Vinayan, P. A. (2017). Status of conflict mitigation measures in Nilambur, Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 9(12), 11025. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3465.9.12.11025-11032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3465.9.12.11025-11032
Singh, R., Negi, R., Gonji, A. I., Sharma, N., & Sharma, R. K. (2024). Past shadows and gender roles: Human elephant relations and conservation in Southern India. Journal of Political Ecology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2834
Treves, A., & Karanth, K. U. (2003). Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide. Conservation Biology, 17(6), 1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vishwanatha H R, Arun Das, Koichi Kimoto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Statement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors who publish with mLAC Journal for Arts, Commerce and Sciences (m-JACS) retain copyright of their articles and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This license allows others to share, use, and build upon the work—commercially or non-commercially—as long as appropriate credit is given to the original authors and source, and any changes are indicated.
The journal encourages open access and supports the free exchange of knowledge while ensuring proper attribution of original work.








