Peer Review Policy

All submissions to m-JACS undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure academic integrity, originality, and relevance to the journal’s scope.

1. Editorial Screening

Each manuscript is initially screened by the Chief Editor to evaluate:

Suitability to the journal’s interdisciplinary focus in Arts, Commerce, Sciences, Computing, Mathematics, Engineering, and related fields
Basic quality of writing, formatting, and adherence to guidelines

2. Peer Review Model

m-JACS follows a Single-Blind Review process:

Reviewers remain anonymous to authors
Authors' identities are visible to reviewers

This process ensures impartiality while allowing reviewers to assess submissions fairly.

3. Reviewer Selection

Independent academic experts and scholars in the relevant field are invited to review the manuscript based on:

Subject matter expertise
Absence of conflict of interest
Willingness to provide constructive, unbiased feedback

4. Review Criteria

Reviewers assess each manuscript on:

Originality and scholarly contribution
Soundness of methodology and theoretical grounding
Clarity, coherence, and organization
Relevance to the journal’s themes and audience

5. Editorial Decisions

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editorial team may decide to:

Accept the manuscript as is
Request minor or major revisions
Reject the manuscript with detailed feedback

Authors are notified of the decision along with anonymized reviewer comments.

6. Quality and Transparency

All reviews are conducted confidentially. Reviewers are expected to follow ethical standards and disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

7. Commitment to Integrity

m-JACS is committed to maintaining a fair, transparent, and timely review process. Every article published has undergone thorough evaluation to ensure academic rigor and reader value.

Peer Review Policy