OPTIMIZING ANIMAL MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR RESEARCH AND TESTING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that environmental chemicals can disrupt normal endocrine functions, causing developmental and reproductive abnormalities in fish and wildlife. This has raised concerns about potential human health risks. Consequently, US legislation now mandates the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create and validate a screening program to identify chemicals in food and water that may act as endocrine disruptors. In response, the EPA proposed the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, which employs both in vitro and in vivo test systems to identify harmful chemicals for humans and ecologically significant species.
However, the endocrine system is highly sensitive to various experimental factors, such as diet and the genetic background of the test animals. To ensure accurate results in endocrine disruptor research, it is crucial to minimize or eliminate factors that contribute to experimental variation. Standard laboratory animal diets, for instance, contain varying levels of phytoestrogens that can mimic the effects of both endogenous and exogenous estrogens. Additionally, studies have shown that some commonly used outbred mice and rats exhibit lower sensitivity to estrogenic substances compared to certain inbred strains.
Thus, selecting appropriate biological models and diets that offer optimal sensitivity and specificity is essential for endocrine disruptor studies. This issue introduces 11 papers that delve into critical experimental design considerations and review current laboratory animal and in vitro models used in endocrine disruptor research. Careful selection of animal models and experimental design parameters will minimize confounding variables, enhance the reproducibility of results, and lead to more reliable and relevant test systems.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Ankley GT, Johnson RD. 2004. Small fish models for identifying and assessing the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. ILAR J 45: 469-483.
Boettger-Tong HL, Murphy C, Cahiappetta C, Kirkland JL, Goodwin B, Adlercreutz H, Stancel GM, Makela S. 1998. A case of laboratory animal feed with high estrogenic activity and its impact on in vivo responses to exogenously administered estrogens. Environ. Health Perspect 106:369-373.
Carson R. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston MA: Boston University Press. Charles GD. 2004. In vitro models in endocrine disruptor screening. ILAR J 45:494-501. Colborn T. 2004. Commentary: Setting aside tradition when dealing with endocrine disruptors. ILAR J 45:394-400.
Colborn T, Dumanoski D, Meyers JP. 1996. Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story. New York: Plume/Penguin Books.
deFur PL. 2004. Use and role of invertebrate models in endocrine disruptor research and testing. ILAR J 45:484-493. EDSTAC [Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee]. 1998. Final Report. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/ oscpendo/history/finalrpt.htm. EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]. 1998.
Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Statement of Policy; Notice Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Priority-Setting Workshop; Notice. 63 FR 71541, December 28, 1998.
EDMVS [Endocrine Disruptor Methods Validation Subcommittee]. 2003. White Paper on Species/Strain/Stock in Endocrine Disruptor Assays. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/oscpendo/assayvalidation/mtg_081803.htm.
EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]. 2004. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/ oscpendo/edspoverview/index.htm [accessed 12 July 2004].
ICCVAM [Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods ]. 1997.
Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Toxicological Test Methods: A Report of the ad hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods. (NIH Publication No: 97-3981).
Research Triangle Park NC: NIEHS. Available online: http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/guidelines/validate.pdf [accessed 29 August 2003].
Everitt JI, Foster PMD. 2004. Laboratory animal science issues in the design and conduct of studies with endocrine-active compounds. ILAR J 45:417-424.
Gray LE Jr, Wilson V, Noriega N, Lambright C, Furr J, Stoker TE, Laws SC, Goldman J, Cooper RL, Foster PMD. 2004. Use of the laboratory rat as an animal model in endocrine disruptor screening and testing. ILAR J 45:425-437.
Howdeshell KL, Peterman PH, Judy BM, Taylor JA, Orazio CE, Ruhler RL, Vom Saal FS, Welshons WV. 2003. Bisphenol A is released from used polycarbonate animal cages into water at room temperature. Environ Health Perspect 111:1180-1187.
ICCVAM [Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods]. 2003. Guidelines for the Nomination and Submission of New, Revised, and Alternative Test Methods. (NIH Publication No. 03-4508). Research Triangle Park NC:
NIEHS. Available online: http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/guidelines/subguide.htm IPCS [International Programme on Chemical Safety] 2002. Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors. Damstra T, ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Lephart ED, Setchell KDR, Handa RJ, Lund TD. 2004. Models for evaluating behavioral effects of endocrine-disrupting substances: Phytoestrogens. ILAR J 45:443-454. NRC [National Research Council]. 1999. Hormonally Active Agents in the Environment. Washington DC: National Academy Press. PL [Public Law] 104-170. 1996a. Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.
Available online: http://www.epa.gov/opppsps1/fqpa/gpogate/ pdf [accessed 12 July 2004]. PL [Public Law] 104-182. 1996b.
Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments (SDWA) of 1996. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ sdwa/text.html [accessed 12 July 2004].
Spearow JL, Doemeny P, Sera R, Leffler R, Barkley M. 1999. Genetic variation in susceptibility to endocrine disruption by estrogen in mice. Science 285:1259-1261.
Spearow J. 2003. White Paper Presentation on Species/Strain/Stock inEndocrine Disruptor Assays. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ scipoly/oscpendo/assayvalidation/mtg_081803.htm.
Stokes WS. 2003. The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM): Recent Progress in the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicity Testing Methods. In: Salem H and Katz S, eds. Alternative Toxicological Methods. New York: CRC Press. p 15-30.
Thigpen JE, Setchell KDR, Saunders HE, Haseman JK, Grant MG, Forsythe DB. 2004. Selecting the appropriate rodent diet for endocrine disruptor research and testing studies. ILAR J 45:401-416.
Touart LW. 2004. Factors considered in using birds for evaluating endocrine-disrupting chemicals. ILAR J 45:462-468. Vandenbergh JG. 2004. Animal models and studies of in utero endocrine disruptor effects. ILAR J 45:438-442.
Vandenbergh JG, Huggett CL. 1995. The anogenital distance index, a predictor of the intrauterine position effects on reproduction in female house mice. Lab Anim Sci 45:567-573.
Walker VR, Korach KS. 2004. Estrogen receptor knockout mice as a model for endocrine research. ILAR J 45:456-462.